Just in time for Maria Curtin’s roundtable Monday on “Assessment Tools We All Can Use,” David Scobey writes this week in Inside Higher Ed about the resistance many faculty in the humanities feel toward assessments of student learning:
Yet (especially in a time of scarcity and crisis) it is a fair challenge to the academy that we be accountable for the vast resources and autonomy to which we lay claim-that we offer a compelling argument about our value to the larger society. Precisely because others have their own reductionist agendas of how to measure success in higher education, we need to offer our own vision of means and ends. The most self-damaging response we can make is to build a defensive bulwark of guild privileges around ourselves.
More substantively, it is not simply in our interest but in the best traditions of the humanities to pose the questions that underlie the calls for assessment. What constitutes a good liberal education, one that is emancipatory and transformative for students? What is the distinctive role of the humanities in that education? How do we know whether our educational practices embody these values? It is hard to find assessment tools that advance rich answers to these questions; all the more reason for skeptical humanists to enter the conversation.
Read the full article here.
Posted by Stacy Grooters
Assessment Tools We All Can Use
This week “All Tech Considered” investigates the use of “clickers” in the classroom.